About 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, November 21, 1996, the six-story commercial Humberto
Vidal building in Rio Piedras, a popular shopping and tourist district of San
Juan, Puerto Rico, suddenly blew up, killing 33 people and injuring at least
80. The building’s first, second, third, and portions of the fourth floors
shattered, dropping into the basement on top of the Humberto Vidal Shoe Store
manager and the building’s long-time air conditioner technician. The
administrator of nearby Chicken Kingdom restaurant knew what caused the explosion
as the Puerto Rico police dispatched a bomb squad to investigate.
 |
 |
| University of Puerto Rico (main campus) in Rio Piedras,
San Juan, Puerto Rico. Source: In the public domain, at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:LaUniversidad.JPG;
accessed May 26, 2007. |
Humberto Vidal building minutes after the explosion on December
13, 1996. Source: National Transportation Safety Board: “San Juan
Gas Company, Inc./Enron Corp. Propane Gas Explosion in San Juan, Puerto
Rico, on November 21, 1996. Pipeline Accident Report, Adopted December
23, 1997, Notation 6789C, Washington, DC, p.10. Available online at: http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/1997/PAR9701.pdf;
accessed May 25, 2007. |
Police officers tending the intersection of Camelia Soto and Arzuaga Streets
ran toward the building to help the injured and those trapped on the upper
fifth and sixth floors, which remained relatively intact. Firefighters at the
Rio Piedras fire station, about ¼-mile from the Humberto Vidal building,
heard the explosion and arrived in a pumper truck about a minute later. They “observed
cars turned upside down, injured and dead people in the street, and devastated
buildings, but no fire. They radioed for assistance, and within minutes, additional
fire, medical, and police personnel and equipment arrived. Firefighters provided
first aid, removed bodies, and evaluated the risks of entering the building.” (1)
Nearby Rio Piedras Medical Center received notification of the explosion at
8:42 a.m. and activated its disaster plan. Eventually local hospitals received
80 injured people. La Milagrosa School across the street became the triage
site. Search and rescue teams activated, including representatives from the
U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA, Urban Search and Rescue team)
following declaration of a state of emergency by then U.S. President Clinton.
(2)
The Humberto Vidal building was unstable, necessitating discontinuation of
rescue until structural engineers could asses the building. By 12:30 p.m. that
same day, the engineers had identified those areas of the building believed
to be stable enough for the workers to enter. FEMA staff extricated 10 bodies
and located an 11th body too dangerous to recover. (2) By December 21, 1996,
rescue workers removed the last four bodies, bringing the total number of dead
to 33. The Salvation Army and the American Red Cross provided support services
throughout the ordeal.
A day after the explosion, a team including bomb-sniffing dogs from the U.S.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) examined the building and its
debris for evidence of explosives. Samples of concrete, plaster, and a paint
can examined at the ATF’s Forensic Science Laboratory showed no evidence
of explosives and that damage to the building had resulted from a fuel-based
explosion. (3)
Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico is a United States unincorporated territory with Commonwealth
status. It shares common citizenship, common defense, and common currency.
(4) Its population is around 4 million people (2006). San Juan, the capital
of Puerto Rico, boasts a population of some 433,000 people. Rio Piedras was
once a separate town south of San Juan but merged with San Juan in 1951. The
population of Rio Piedras is about 9,400 people (2000 census). Since 1903,
it has been the home of the main campus of the University of Puerto Rico. (5)
Humberto Vidal, Inc.
Humberto Vidal is a retail merchandise company that owns about 30 stores
in Puerto Rico, selling shoes, socks, handbags, and related items. (6) Its
administrative offices occupied the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth floors
of the Humberto Vidal building in Rio Piedras. The first and second floors
housed a jewelry store, a record store, and the Humberto Vidal Shoe Store.
The Humberto Vidal building usually held about 50+ employees, including 37
who worked in the administrative offices, 7 in the jewelry store, 12 in the
shoe store, and 2 in the record store. (7) Observers note that the death toll
from the explosion was not higher because most stores were not open, few shoppers
were in the area at the time of the explosion, and many employees in the Humberto
Vidal building had not yet arrived for work. On a typical shopping day, hundreds
of shoppers and tourists were near or in the building.
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board Investigation
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), established in 1967,
is responsible for investigating accidents involving aviation, highway, marine,
pipelines, and railroads in the U.S. and its territories, including Puerto
Rico. In January 1997, NTSB staff observed that damage inflicted on the Humberto
Vidal building was consistent with overpressure (rather than fire) and that
the area most affected by the heat was in the basement near an air conditioner
exchange unit.
The NTSB staff identified three possible sources of the fuel-based explosion:
- Propane gas from storage tanks,
- Naturally generated gases from the sewer system (8) or from deteriorating
vegetation, and
- Propane from the San Juan Gas Company’s propane/air distribution
pipeline system. (9)
The only propane tanks in the area were small cylinders located behind the
Sbarro Pizza restaurant, just south of Chicken Kingdom restaurant. Investigators
used pressure tests to confirm their integrity. No damage to the sewer system
occurred and the smell of sewer system gas is distinctly different from the
smell of the propane odorant that many witnesses smelled before the explosion.
Thus, the NTSB staff concluded that the propane from the San Juan Gas Company’s
distribution pipeline caused the explosion.
The San Juan Gas Company
The San Juan Gas Company (SJGC) is a corporation wholly owned by Enron Corporation. “Enron
was incorporated as Northern Natural Gas Company on April 25, 1930, in Delaware.
In 1908, the corporate name was changed to InterNorth, Inc.; and in 1986, it
was changed to Enron Corp. Petrolane Incorporated sold all outstanding stock
of the SJGC, then a Delaware corporation, to The Protane Corporation; and it,
in turn, on the same date transferred the assets to InterNorth, Inc. The SJGC
continues to be managed and operated by its own slate of directors and officers,
and its chairman is the CEO of an Enron affiliate operation.” (10)
The SJGC distributed a 60 percent propane/40 percent air mix to customers
in the greater San Juan area through 220 miles of gas mains, both low pressure
(1/4 pound per square inch gauge, or psig, a unit of measure to indicate the
pressure on a surface) to high pressure (20 psig) piping systems. (10) Low
pressure systems primarily served Rio Piedras in about 6 miles of 4-inch diameter
cast-iron gas mains and 3.2 miles of mostly 1¼-inch diameter galvanized
steel service lines. The distribution system in Rio Piedras served about 500
customers, including Humberto Vidal. The NTSB staff learned that the service
lines connecting the gas main under Camelia Soto Street onto which the Humberto
Vidal building opened was made of bare steel and was not resistant to corrosion.
Similarly, a tee-section connecting the plastic gas main on Camelia Soto to
the service lines for the Chicken Kingdom and another building were not made
of steel. (10)
Infrastructure Underneath Camelia Soto Street
Many pipes and conduits run beneath Camelia Soto Street, including lines
in use, lines for future use, and abandoned lines. Two water mains, a sewer
main, a plastic gas line, telephone conduits, and electric conduits were (are)
under there. Over the years, service providers had abandoned conduits, including
a gas main, electric conduits, sewer laterals, and water service lines, without
plugging or otherwise sealing them. Proper plugging would have prevented them
from being paths for gases entering the soil. NTSB staff learned from Enron
records that gas leakage was a big problem for years before the explosion.
At least five of the conduits and pipes beneath Camelia Soto entered the Humberto
Vidal building at its southwest corner and from there dove down into the basement.

Map of affected area. Source: National Transportation Safety Board: “San
Juan Gas Company, Inc./Enron Corp. Propane Gas Explosion in San Juan, Puerto
Rico, on November 21, 1996. Pipeline Accident Report, Adopted December
23, 1997, Notation 6789C, Washington, DC, p. 24. Available online at: http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/1997/PAR9701.pdf;
accessed May 25, 2007. |
In 1985, according to SJGC records, technicians installed a 1¼-inch
polyethylene gas pipe on the opposite (west) side of Camelia Soto Street (on
its east side were the Humberto Vidal building, Chicken Kingdom, and Sbarro
Pizza). Later, gas company technicians extended the 1 1/4-inch gas pipeline
in a 90 degree turn to provide service to the building in which Chicken Kingdom
lived.
In 1991, the Puerto Rico Aqueducts and Sewer Authority installed a 16-inch
diameter water transmission pipeline under Camelia Soto Street but did not
know about the 1¼-inch plastic gas pipe installed by the gas company
in 1985.
To make matters more interesting, the Puerto Rico Telephone Company in 1992
modified its facilities under Camelia Soto near the Humberto Vidal building.
The telephone company held several meetings with the various utilities to ascertain
the positions of water, sewer, and gas pipelines in the area. In spite of the
diligence, the telephone company supervisor of the excavation project first
learned about one pipe—the plastic one going to Chicken Kingdom—when
a backhoe operator severed it. The gas company responded quickly to repair
the damaged pipe and said that the company would probably abandon that section
of gas line in the future. (11) “The project supervisor recalled that
due to the existence of the gas line, he had to alter his construction procedures
by placing some ducts side by side, rather than on top of one another. During
the project, he said, he called the SJGC about five times and the SJGC had
to repair about three leaks. He said that he often had to use his own excavation
equipment to help the SJGC, as its employees did not bring a backhoe.” (11)
Gas Leak Surveys
The San Juan Gas Company was supposed to perform leak surveys each year in
high-density or commercial locations. However, technicians surveyed no part
of Rio Piedras for propane-leaking gas pipes between 1994 and 1996. In 1996,
technicians did survey it with a portable flame ionization detection unit that
sampled the air from barholes drilled into the pavement. Technicians found
and repaired 55 leaks. Of the 55 leaks, 13 were in the 12-block area around,
but not adjacent to, the Humberto Vidal building.
“Unaccounted for” gas is the difference between the quantity of
gas that enters the gas system and the quantity that customers receive. The
SJGC board of directors noted in 1996 that about 25 percent of its gas was
unaccounted for, but attributed the loss to billing and metering problems (7
percent) and theft (18 percent) and none to leakage. (12)
Propane Gas
Most people know propane as the fuel in a white container attached to a barbecue
grill. Propane has many other uses, however, and has long heated homes and
heated water, dried clothes, fueled gas fireplaces and cooktops, and fueled
vehicles such as buses, some locomotives, forklifts and even taxis.
Propane naturally occurs as a colorless, odorless gas at atmospheric (room)
pressure. Application of a moderate amount of pressure compresses it into a
liquid that can be stored and transported. The release of propane from a pressurized
storage container by opening a valve results in vaporization of the gas for
use. Propane’s familiar name is “liquefied petroleum gas”,
or LPG or LP-gas. (13)
Propane gas is heavier than air, and has a tendency to sink or flow downhill
into any low-lying enclosed area where it may pose a risk of explosion and
fire. During gas leak surveys where propane is in the pipelines, technicians
must be careful to drill down an appropriate distance or else they may miss
low-lying propane pockets.
People who inhale propane in concentrations of greater than 10 percent experience
dizziness in a few minutes. High concentrations cause suffocation. (14)
Many odorants are available to add to liquid gas to render it noticeable to
people when a gas pipeline leaks. The San Juan Gas Company used the foul-smelling
odorant ethyl mercaptan, whose intensity technicians tested monthly, albeit
not in the way their procedures showed. If technicians add inadequate amounts
of odorant, the gas will not have a smell and may go unnoticed during a leak.
Records show that for some reason in January 1996, 11 months before the explosion,
SJGC began conducting weekly odor intensity tests. (15)
Some individuals with nasal perception problems may not be able to smell the
odorant, even when it is present in sufficient amounts. Leaking propane may
lose its odor as it passes through certain soils. Therefore, circumstances
exist when some people are in the presence of leaking propane and are unable
to detect the odorant. Reliance upon detection of odors to take action may
not provide adequate warning of potentially hazardous concentrations.
Corroded Leaking Propane Infrastructure
The NTSB investigators discovered a crack in the plastic 1¼-inch pipe
in front of Chicken Kingdom. After testing, investigators determined that the
pipe had been leaking propane at a rate of 1.70 cubic feet per minute (102
cubic feet per hour). (16) Investigators also found other significantly leaking
gas pipes under the street, discussed elsewhere. (17)
How Did Propane Enter the Humberto Vidal Building?
Investigators were not able to determine the precise path the propane followed
from the leaky pipes under Camelia Soto Street into the basement of the Humberto
Vidal building. The cracked pipe leading to Chicken Kingdom was right above
a 16-inch-diameter water line that technicians had installed in 1982. The propane
could have followed this or many other conduits downhill toward the Humberto
Vidal building to the north.
Fueling the Explosion
Investigators calculated a release of 36.7 cubic feet/hour of propane in
front of Chicken Kingdom, assuming that only the propane released from this
crack in the plastic pipe entered the Humberto Vidal building basement. They
then calculated that this rate of release “would have taken about 57
hours for enough propane (2,100 cubic feet) to enter [the basement] to raise
the gas-in-air level to 6 percent.” (18) The optimal fuel/air mixture
in the basement at the time of ignition was about 5 to 6 percent gas in air,
which would have provided a maximum-force explosion. The NTSB investigators
concluded that the propane/air released from under Camelia Soto entered the
Humberto Vidal basement was the fuel source for the explosion.
The Human Perspective
Astonishingly, employees and customers of the Humberto Vidal building AND
Chicken Kingdom had complained to the San Juan Gas Company repeatedly about
the smell of propane gas (actually the smell of the mercaptan odorant added
to the gas) for at least seven days before the explosion.
More than a week before the explosion, Chicken Kingdom employees told their
supervisor about a strong smell of gas that came and went. The supervisor called
the company that serviced his gas cooking equipment, which tested all of the
equipment and found no problems. The equipment-company personnel “assumed
that the odor must be associated with gas work going on along Camelia Soto,
since someone was constantly there checking for gas leaks.” (19)
The Chicken Kingdom administrator used a payphone to call SJGC, explaining
the situation and that the smell of gas came and went. The gas company employee
told the administrator that the gas company “would take care of the problem.” (19)
The gas company employee did not ask for the Chicken King administrator’s
name, whether the smell was inside or outside, or any other questions. After
he made the report, the administrator saw a gas company truck and employees
working in the area and assumed they had come in response to his call.
On Thursday, November 14, 1996, one week before the explosion,
the gas company’s 27-year veteran dispatcher acknowledged receipt of
the first report about a gas odor at 8:15 a.m. from the Humberto Shoe Store
manager. The manager said that he smelled gas “when he opened the store
and that when he went to the basement, he could smell gas, although the odor
was not very strong.” (20) The dispatcher told the manager to leave the
basement door ajar and not to turn on anything having to do with electricity.
A gas company technician arrived at 9:30 a.m. and walked down the basement
stairs with the manager who pointed to a corner of the basement from which
the gas smell was emanating. The technician turned on a detector, which “did
not beep”, and left, saying that he could smell a slight odor on the
street but not in the basement. The technician did not activate the detector
before entering the enclosed space of the basement, which negated its efficacy.
(20)
On Friday, November 15, 1996, a gas company brigade arrived
to the building at 8:15 a.m. and its 40-year-veteran gas company leader accompanied
the shoe store manager into the basement. Neither could smell gas at the time
and the gas company employee had no instrument to test the air in the basement.
However, he did go outside to survey the underground with a combustible gas
indicator, which he inserted into barholes 12 to 18 inches deep and about four
feet apart, freshly dug by the crew. (A barhole is a small-diameter hole made
in the ground along the route of a gas pipe in a bar test survey.) The main
pipe carrying the liquid propane under pressure was some 2-3 feet below the
road surface. The discrepancy between the depth of the barholes and the actual
main was important because propane gas sinks.
The brigade leader said that the combustible gas indicator read zero except
at one or two spots where it registered at 2 to 3 percent on the lower end
of the lower explosive limit scale. The crew probed the gas main going down
Camelia Soto, along which the gas indicator registered zero; supposedly capped
off an old line going to the Humberto Vidal building; used soap solution to
test the gas main for leaks and found none, and left, telling the manager to
call again if he smelled more gas.
On Monday, November 18, 1996, a Humberto Vidal employee again
complained to the Humberto Shoe Store manager that the smell of gas in the
shoe store was strong. The manager replied that he had notified the gas company
and that it was not paying much attention. The manager and employee descended
the stairs, whereupon the employee became so dizzy and nauseated that they
had to return back upstairs to get fresh air.
Tuesday, November 19, 1996, was a holiday, and the shoe store was not
open.
On Wednesday, November 20, 1996, the same employee again
smelled gas and refused to descend the stairs into the basement because she
was afraid. Someone again called the gas company, which again sent another
brigade because “they [employees at the Humberto Vidal Building] keep
on calling.” (20) The manager told a Humberto Vidal official about the
odor. The official told him to open the door or get some fans if the smell
got worse, as “he did not want customers to smell the gas.” (20)
The manager could not leave the door to the store open because he was unable
to watch the merchandise if the door were left open.
The brigade leader on November 20, 1996, was a four-year employee of the gas
company who went into the basement without a detector, but did detect a smell,
which he quickly attributed to rubber shoes stored there. (Humberto Vidal employees
at the time were unpacking shoes to put them onto the shelves of the store.)
Humberto Vidal employees said that the smell was in addition to the smell of
rubber from shoes. The smell in the basement was so strong, employees stacked
merchandise arriving at the store that day on the first floor instead of in
the basement. (21)
The brigade made new barholes along multiple streets, but found no indications
of combustible gas in them. It did not probe the gas service to the Chicken
Kingdom because it did not know there was a gas service to that establishment.
The leader did not call the dispatcher to learn the locations of gas pipes
in the area, nor did he use a pipe locator, the maps in his truck, or other
means to locate the gas lines. (21) Meanwhile Humberto Vidal employees continued
to smell the odor of propane gas (odorant) in rooms in the building. The brigade
again returned to the area and re-tested all of the new barholes made by the
crew earlier that morning. Again, they showed no signs of combustible gas.
On Thursday, November 21, about 6:45 a.m., a father and son
air conditioning contractor, which had worked for the Humberto Vidal office
for 10 years, arrived to perform routine monthly maintenance of the air conditioners.
The manager smelled gas, but switched on the lights without consequence and
took the elevator with the father and son air conditioner technicians. Later
the son said that he might have smelled rubber, but not gas, when he arrived
to the building that morning. He completed his work at 7:40 a.m. and left.
Many employees continued to smell gas.
The gas company sent a third brigade, led by a four-year employee of the gas
company, reassessed the previous set of barholes, drilled some more (18 inches
deep), and still found no evidence of combustible gas. The administrator of
Chicken Kingdom saw the gas company brigade and noticed about a half hour before
the explosion a “little” gas odor in the store when the breeze
blew into the store. The brigade leader then had some barholes drilled at the
corner of Camelia Soto and de Diego streets where upon he measured 20 percent
on the has scale with his combustible gas indicator, but still did not smell
the odor of gas. Then the explosion occurred, around 8:30 a.m., lifting him
into the air and throwing him about 15 to 20 feet to the north.
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board Determinations
The National Transportation Safety Board determined that the probable cause
of the propane gas explosion was an earlier excavation-caused gas leak that
permitted propane gas to flow downhill to fill the basement of the Humberto
Vidal office building. In addition,
- The San Juan Gas Company failed to oversee the actions of its employees
to identify and correct unsafe conditions, and to provide its employees with
training,
- The Office of Pipeline Safety under the Research and Special Programs Administration
within the U.S. Department of Transportation failed to oversee the pipeline
safety program in Puerto Rico,
- The Puerto Rico Public Service Commission failed to require San Juan Gas
Company to correct identified safety deficiencies, and
- Enron Corporation failed to oversee adequately the operation of San Juan
Gas Company.
One of the most important factors contributing to loss of life was the failure
of people to leave the area even after they detected the odor of gas for an
entire week.
Brief Summary
Aging infrastructure is a hazard. Aging infrastructure is everywhere. If you
smell gas, leave the area immediately and call the authorities. Do not use
any electrical appliances (e.g., air conditioner); do not smoke; and do not
connect or disconnect any appliance or any other source ignition or flame.
Do not try to repair or stop the gas leak yourself; move to a safe place against
the wind and wait for the arrival of the gas company personnel; and inform
others in the area about the possibility of a gas leak. (22)
Gas company personnel are the experts in gas leak situations. (23) San Juan
Gas Company personnel in the week leading up to the explosion were supposed
to be responsible for “taking immediate and effective action in all emergencies,
such as when gas is detected inside or near buildings, when there is a fire
or explosion in or near gas lines, or when there is a natural disaster. (22)
Moreover, the field supervisor was supposed to be responsible for determining
which of the following kinds of action were appropriate: “evacuating,
eliminating all sources of ignition, ventilating the area, locating the gas
leak, repairing the gas leak, coordinating the work with firemen, police, civil
defense, etc., and helping control traffic and crowds in the area.” (22)
Five gas company employees sustained injuries in the explosion.
Notes:
- National Transportation Safety Board: “San Juan Gas Company, Inc./Enron
Corp. Propane Gas Explosion in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on November 21, 1996.
Pipeline Accident Report, Adopted December 23, 1997, Notation 6789C, Washington,
DC, p.9. Available online at: http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/1997/PAR9701.pdf and
at: http://www.ntsb.gov/recs/letters/1997/P97_39.pdf;
accessed May 25, 2007.
- FEMA: “Humberto Vidal Building Explosion, 1996”, available
at: http://www.fema.gov/emergency/usr/usrhv96.shtm;
accessed May 25, 2007.
- NTSB Report, p. 27.
- See: “Commonwealth (United States insular area) at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_%28United_States_insular_area%29 and “Puerto
Rico” at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico;
accessed May 25, 2007.
- See “Rio Piedras” at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Piedras;
accessed May 26, 2007.
- NTSB Report, p. 36.
- Ibid, p. 11.
- See: SEMP Biot #356: “The Guadalajara 1992 Sewer Gas Explosion Disaster” (May
3, 2006). Available at: http://www.semp.us/publications/biot_reader.php?BiotID=356;
accessed May 26, 2007.
- NTSB Report, p. 38.
- Ibid, pp. 1,16.
- Ibid, p. 17.
- Ibid, p. 22.
- “Propane” at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propane;
accessed May 25, 2007.
- Material Safety Data Sheet for Odorized Propane”, available at:
http://www.amerigas.com/pdf/MSDS2002.pdf;
accessed May 25, 2007.
- NTSB Report, p. 19.
- Ibid, p. 25.
- Ibid, p. 39.
- Ibid, pp. 39-40.
- Ibid, p. 2.
- Ibid, p.3.
- Ibid, p. 7.
- Ibid, p. 18.
- “Eight-Inch Natural Pipeline Intrusion: Anatomy
of Local Public Safety Emergency Response.” In SEMP Securitas Magazine,
Jan/Feb/Mar 2007 issue, volume 6, number 1. Available at: http://www.semp.us/publications/securitas_reader.php?SecuritasID=31;
accessed May 26, 2007. See also: “Construction
and Infrastructure Disturbance Risk to the Public: The 2005 Bergenfield,
NJ, Gas Explosion and Fire, Killing Three People”. In SEMP Securitas
Magazine, Apr/May/Jun 2007 issue, volume 6, number 2. Available at: http://www.semp.us/publications/securitas_reader.php?SecuritasID=32;
accessed May 26, 2007. Finally, see also: SEMP Biot #356: “The Guadalajara
1992 Sewer Gas Explosion Disaster” (May 3, 2006). Available at: http://www.semp.us/publications/biot_reader.php?BiotID=356;
accessed May 26, 2007.